Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ºÀå±â ¾Æµ¿¿¡¼­ ÇôÀÇ ÇüÅ°¡ Ä¡¾Æ À§Ä¡ ¹× ±¸°­¾È¸éºÎ ÇüÅ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼±°èÃøÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

A cephalometric study on the effect of shape of the tongue to position of teeth and orofacial morphology in growing children

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1993³â 17±Ç 2È£ p.387 ~ 403
¹ÚÁ¤Çö, À¯Á¾¸¸, ÀÌ»óÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁ¤Çö ( Park Jeong-Hyun ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À¯Á¾¸¸ ( Yoo Jong-Man ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óÈ£ ( Lee Sang-Ho ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the size and position of uongue, position of teeth, and orofacial morphology during growth period.
The subjects used in this study were 172 children, ranging from 7 to 13 years of age, without anatomical abnormalities or aberrant oral habit.
Cephalometric radiographs and study models were used to evaluate the size and position of tongue, position of teeth, orofacial morphology and their relationships.
@ES The obtained results were as follows:
@EN 1. The average distance of U1-M was 20.1mm in deepbite group, 19.0mm in normal group, 16.1mm in anterior crossbite group, and 15.5mm in open bite group, There was a statistical significance among groups(P<0.01).
2. There was generally low correlation between the size and length of tongue, size of arch on the dental cast, and the position of teeth(¥ã=0.25-0.49).
3. There was moderate correlation between the size and length of tongue, and anterior facial height in normal group and deepbite group(¥ã=0.40-0.69).
4. The position of teeth showed close correlation with anteroposterior position of the tongue than that of vertical position in openbite group and anterior crossbite group(¥ã=0.32-0.66).
5. There was low correlation between the size and length of tongue, anterior facial height, and posterior facial height in deepbite group(¥ã=0.30=0.40).
6. There was moderate correlation between the vertical position of tongue, ODI, and APDI in anterior crossbite group(¥ã=0.45, , ¥ã=0.54 )
In conclusion, morphologic patterns of the tongue were thought to be factors which influence the size of arch, position of teeth, and orofacial morphology, which play an important diagnostic role in children malocclusion treatment.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI